After years of legal whiplash, a 7-judge bench has finally settled: an unstamped contract no longer kills its arbitration clause.
Kerala HC says no leeway: a 1,306-day delay sinks an arbitration appeal — strict four months means strict four months.
The Arbitration Council of India was set up to make us a global hub. Years on, can the institution finally get off the ground?
Courts keep striking down lender-appointed arbitrators. Institutional arbitration could break the deadlock for small loans.
Delhi High Court Rules Email Delivery of Arbitral Awards Valid Under Arbitration Act.
Case Title: Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports v. Ernst and Young Pvt Ltd1Court: Delhi High CourtDate of Judgment: 23.08.2023
The Delhi High Court recently passed a judgment that has affirmed that the delivery of arbitral awards via email is valid under the Arbitration Act.
In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court stated that the delivery of a scanned, signed copy of an arbitral award via email falls squarely within the ambit of valid delivery as stipulated under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.This decision clearly delineates the legal standing of electronic delivery methods in arbitration proceedings.
The court specifically stated that “The law has to keep its pace in tandem with the developing technology. When service by email is an accepted mode of service, then sending scanned signed copy of the award/order of the Arbitral Tribunal to the parties would be a valid delivery as envisaged under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration Act.”
