PART 2: The Rule of Thirds – Mediation in India, Singapore and Dubai

PART 2- India, Singapore, Dubai – The Existing Mediation framework:

As distances shrink and boundaries blur, the evolution of dispute resolution has taken a remarkable leap forward with the advent of online mediation. 

This transformative approach embodies the spirit of accessibility for all. In this article, through the lens of India, Singapore, and Dubai, we witness how the three Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) hotspots have embraced online mediation within their legal frameworks. This piece offers a glimpse into the foundation on which the current ODR discourse stands strong in the three regions. We look at the legal framework that allows for ODR and, in particular, Online Mediation to take center stage in dispute resolution. 

The legal framework governing online mediation in India, Singapore, and Dubai illustrate their commitment to innovation and technology in resolving disputes. Each jurisdiction has tailored its laws with ease to accommodate the unique needs of parties engaging in online mediation.

India:

In recent years, India has made significant strides to alleviate the burden on its judicial system. Central to this effort is the Mediation Act of 2023, which despite being signed into law, is yet to come into effect pending implementation procedures.

The Mediation Act of 2023 draws inspiration from international practices, notably adopting provisions akin to the Singapore Convention on Mediation, to which India is a signatory (albeit without formal ratification). 

Online Mediation and Institutional Framework: Recognizing the evolving landscape of digital interactions, Section 30 of the Mediation Act specifically addresses online mediation, requiring the consent of both parties and adherence to stringent security protocols for audio or video-based sessions. Additionally, Sections 40, 41, and 42 establish a framework for mediation institutions and service providers, which may operate under court annexation and must adhere to council-approved practices and functions as stipulated by the Act.

While India has taken commendable steps towards formalising mediation as a viable alternative to litigation through the Mediation Act of 2023, its effective implementation remains contingent upon further administrative measures. By aligning with international standards and leveraging digital advancements, India aims to streamline dispute resolution processes.

This framework not only underscores India’s commitment to enhancing its legal infrastructure but also reflects its proactive approach in adapting to global best practices in mediation, thereby fostering a more conducive environment for resolving disputes both locally and across borders.

Singapore:

In Singapore, mediation is an essential part of resolving disputes in a thoughtful and efficient way. The foundation of this process is set by key pieces of legislation and supported by various institutions dedicated to helping people find amicable solutions.

Singapore has emerged as a global hub for mediation, and its legal framework for online mediation reflects its progressive approach to ODR. The Singapore Mediation Act, enacted in 2017, provides a robust framework for the enforcement of mediation settlements, including those conducted online.

Under Singaporean law, parties can engage in online mediation facilitated by accredited mediators or mediation institutions. The Act emphasises the enforceability of mediated settlements, reinforcing Singapore’s reputation as a jurisdiction that supports alternative dispute resolution mechanisms as viable alternatives to traditional litigation.

Key Legal Foundations:

The Mediation Act

This Act, effective from January 2018, is designed to ensure that mediation is a confidential and protective process. It guarantees that what’s shared during mediation stays private and can turn mediation agreements into enforceable court orders if needed. It also shields mediators from legal action related to their mediation work, fostering a safe environment for honest dialogue.

Family Justice Act

This Act, which created the Family Justice Courts, focuses on resolving family disputes through mediation. It aims to address issues like divorce, custody, and maintenance in a compassionate way before moving to court. There are several supporting institutions like the SMC and SIMC that underpin the prevailing Mediation process. 

The Singapore Mediation Centre (SMC) is a cornerstone for resolving commercial disputes in Singapore. It not only provides mediation services but also offers training and certification for mediators to ensure they meet high standards.

The Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC) is utilised for international and cross-border disputes, playing a crucial role for the adept administration of the Mediation process. It provides a platform for resolving complex international issues through mediation, helping parties from different countries find common ground.

The Civil and Family Courts also have a part to play in the integration of the process of Mediation into the  Mediation is integrated into court processes to help resolve disputes without a lengthy trial. The Family Justice Courts, in particular, emphasise mediation for family matters to promote peaceful resolutions.

This framework reflects Singapore’s commitment to resolving conflicts in a way that is both compassionate and efficient, providing a supportive environment for finding common ground and fostering positive outcomes.

Dubai:

In Dubai, online mediation is governed by the Dubai Mediation Centre (DMC), which operates under the Dubai Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The DMC offers a structured framework for parties to engage in mediation remotely, utilizing digital platforms to facilitate dialogue and negotiation.

The legal framework supporting online mediation in Dubai emphasises confidentiality, neutrality of mediators, and the enforceability of mediated agreements. Parties have the flexibility to choose mediators from a roster of accredited professionals, ensuring impartiality and expertise in resolving disputes across various sectors.

Dubai’s commitment to promoting online mediation aligns with its broader strategy of enhancing business confidence and fostering a favourable environment for investment. By providing accessible and efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, Dubai aims to attract international businesses and uphold its reputation as a hub for commerce and arbitration in the Middle East.

While India’s Mediation Act of 2023 reflects its emerging role in embracing digital solutions for dispute resolution, Singapore and Dubai have established themselves as global leaders in promoting Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) through robust legal frameworks and institutional support. Collectively, these jurisdictions contribute to the evolution of online mediation as a reliable alternative to traditional litigation, catering to the diverse needs of businesses and individuals navigating complex legal landscapes in a digitally interconnected world.

Conclusion:

India’s Mediation Act of 2023 reflects the country’s emerging role in embracing digital solutions for dispute resolution. Meanwhile, Singapore and Dubai have established themselves as global leaders in promoting ADR through robust legal frameworks and strong institutional support. These jurisdictions have not only crafted comprehensive policies that facilitate online mediation but have also invested in the necessary technological infrastructure and training programs to ensure its effective implementation. By doing so, they are setting global benchmarks for ADR practices, enhancing accessibility, efficiency, and fairness in dispute resolution. Collectively, these efforts contribute to the evolution of online mediation as a reliable and preferred alternative to traditional litigation, addressing the diverse needs of businesses and individuals navigating complex legal landscapes in an increasingly interconnected digital world. Through their commitment to innovation and technology, these jurisdictions are shaping the future of dispute resolution, fostering a dynamic and adaptable environment that meets the demands of modern commerce and dispute resolution.

0 CommentsClose Comments

Leave a comment

Delhi High Court Rules Email Delivery of Arbitral Awards Valid Under Arbitration Act.

Case Title: Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports v. Ernst and Young Pvt Ltd1Court: Delhi High CourtDate of Judgment: 23.08.2023

The Delhi High Court recently passed a judgment that has affirmed that the delivery of arbitral awards via email is valid under the Arbitration Act.

In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court stated that the delivery of a scanned, signed copy of an arbitral award via email falls squarely within the ambit of valid delivery as stipulated under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.This decision clearly delineates the legal standing of electronic delivery methods in arbitration proceedings.

The court specifically stated that “The law has to keep its pace in tandem with the developing technology. When service by email is an accepted mode of service, then sending scanned signed copy of the award/order of the Arbitral Tribunal to the parties would be a valid delivery as envisaged under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration Act.”